Achievement unlocked!
I have Knitted A Sock! It's the "basic sock" pattern out of Folk Socks. It only took five and a half years!
I am actually feeling much prouder of the accomplishment than I expected. And, unexpectedly, it even fits! My left foot is warm. Unfortunately I made it out of some strange yarn I bought at a thrift store that's no longer in business, and there's not quite enough in the same color to do a second sock (there's some almost-the-same-color of the same yarn, though.)
And I still haven't figured out the SSK decrease, but, eh, it feels fine, it just doesn't quite look right. :P
And now I don't have any unfinished knitting or crochet projects kicking around and I'm at loose ends.
I am actually feeling much prouder of the accomplishment than I expected. And, unexpectedly, it even fits! My left foot is warm. Unfortunately I made it out of some strange yarn I bought at a thrift store that's no longer in business, and there's not quite enough in the same color to do a second sock (there's some almost-the-same-color of the same yarn, though.)
And I still haven't figured out the SSK decrease, but, eh, it feels fine, it just doesn't quite look right. :P
And now I don't have any unfinished knitting or crochet projects kicking around and I'm at loose ends.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 72
What should I do?
View Answers
Um, knit the other sock out of the pair (even if you will have to use a slightly different yarn color)
53 (73.6%)
Start one of the 19th century patterns out of the book, to wear for cosplay, which was the original plan once you had leveled up Knitter of Socks five years ago.
14 (19.4%)
Start one of the non-sock knitting projects you've been saying you will once sock was done, like that Icelandic sweater you bought all that lopi for.
14 (19.4%)
Good now finish up all your unfinished sewing/embroidery/quilting/naalbinding/spinning/weaving/mending/electronics repair/painting projects before you start something new.
12 (16.7%)
Ticky.
23 (31.9%)
no subject
SSKs are overrated imo.
no subject
no subject
However, I still can't tell SSK from K2TBL. So... whatever works.
no subject
no subject
I really do like the result better than what I got when trying to do it American-style, though. I though it was because I was doing it wrong, but maybe it's just worse. :P
no subject
no subject
I had the same issue, but I think I must have been using a different heel turn technique--I made a pair of socks that way that had a wonderful spiral twist all up the ankle, but the heels still worked out.
no subject
I think so? I took a "basic" class from a German woman (who did apologize to us for probably confusing us for life!) who was teaching some version of continental, and then I spent many years (pre-youtube) messing around without patterns or from very old books, and then when I decided to try to level up and knit things that were not just tubes or rectangles with very simple increase/decreases, I was using Icelandic patterns. So I think I default to something similar, but not identical to, combined knitting. I tried to teach myself American style a few years back, but I'm not sure I was doing that right either, so I stopped before I learned a different set of bad habits. And I found it a lot harder on the wrists and fingers, too, so I wasn't super invested in retraining.
no subject
To me usually K2TOG looks like one column of stitches got eaten by the other one, while SSK looks like two columns smoothly merged into one, but I think that's mostly because I'm usually better at SSK because slipping makes the stitches a bit looser so it's easier to get in there and knit them together. So the two connected stitches lie a little more flat, and any bunching that happens is mostly on the wrong/purl side of the knitting.
But it doesn't really matter as long as you have a decrease.
no subject
(I have the same problem with increases, and a sweater which has been stalled out for years because of it--I can't find a formula for bust darts that doesn't rely on being able to make right- and left-slanted increases.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yep, that's exactly what all the books say too! But I don't have a twist in the yarn at that point so it doesn't do anything. I was mostly worried on the sock that it would be the wrong kind of lumpy, but I think, based on the way my sock pattern was using them, that ssk/k2tog are inverses, such that if you do one at one end of a row, and one at the other, your result will be symmetrical? So I have a very slightly non-symmetrical toe and it's fine. Unfortunately some of the fancier historical patterns in my Folk Socks book actually use the increases/descreases as part of the pattern, so if I want to keep going in the book, I should probably figure it out. If I decide to do it right I may just end up doing a sampler with all the increases/decreases in the book and messing around until I manage to get something that looks right for each one, which is pretty much the only way I learn motor skills anyway.
no subject
But I suspect that even when it's part of the pattern, the fact of the decrease is more important that what it looks like.
no subject
For a lot of stockings with knitted "clocks", the heel shaping is the pattern, and the way you do different increases/decreases is part of what makes it fancy clocks rather than a shaped heel. But I think they're using fancier decreases than ssk for those, too. And some of the Scandinavian colorwork socks work hidden decreases into the color pattern (like in a sweater yoke, but more confusing) although I think those mostly just use k2tog.
no subject
IDK what just happened but i think it's time for bed.
no subject
I think you get better results if you google clocks stockings, but most of the results seem to be for fancy embroidered ones rather than knitted-in (it's the same idea though, the embroidery disguises the heel shaping.)
no subject
no subject
A warm left foot is definitely not something to turn one's nose up at!
no subject
no subject
(Nice Jupiter, btw.)
no subject
Sadly not an option! This is a weird yarn that I could never match the texture on and don't have a label for (I'm not even completely sure of the fiber - it might be an odd wool blend, it might be one of the old scratchy synthetics from before they had polyester quite figured out.) The yarn I don't have enough for a second sock is red-red-blue 3ply and the only other big enough ball is red-brown-blue. So my option are either red-brown-blue or patching together multiple colors (I think there are smaller balls of brown-brown-green and brown-green-red, but not enough for a whole second sock.)
no subject
Man, now I'm contemplating argyle socks with lacework legs. I've only knitted one pair!
If it wasn't gardening season, I'd cast on a mobius scarf.
no subject
One of the first projects I ever did was a mobius scart! I did it the topologically valid way with circular crochet on a twisted loop, even, instead of putting the twist in later like most patterns I see these days.
no subject
no subject
I also recommend, if you think it might be for you, doing your socks two-at-a-time on magic loop - it completely removes the horrible realization that you've finished Sock #1 and now have the whole-entire-nother sock to do. D:
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
..having actually googled it, magic loop appears to be a way to pretend you are using DPNs with a circular needle, except with only three needles, which is too few DPNs. (I definitely had laddering issues the time I tried to do a whole cuff with only three DPNs because I had lost the other three.) So unless you're super-afraid of your needles falling out (which I've only had as a problem on metal dpns, never plastic, wood, or bamboo) it should not be too different, except that the cast-on always seems harder.
no subject
It does seem like an excellent way to keep your sizing the same, if nothing else. I'm not sure I'm up to that yet, though, and for the historical socks I want to use historical methods. (Also most of the magic loop I've seen involves circular needles, and I much prefer DPNs for circular knitting, although I am told it is possible on dpns.)
no subject
(I've not yarn chickened, any more than I've raced for pinks. I need to finish a UFO that was supposed to be a scarf but is acrylic. My winters are too woolen for knitted acrylic.)
no subject
My only definition of yarn chicken is when you're afraid you're going to run out of yarn, and I do that on pretty much every project already. :P
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject