Entry tags:
FMK# 31: I heard it on the internet
The mysteries F winner was the cat detectives. I am shocked, I tell you, shocked. I have already read one of the stories in it, and there were not nearly as many cats as advertised. :( The K winner was the Garrison Keillor, which is helpful because it means I don't have to keep wondering if I want to read it or not, you people have informed me I don't.
I have not read any other new FMK this week because I have been catching up on comics and other stuff. Also I saw Thor 3! That was an EPICALLY silly movie. I approve. EPICALLY silly is the only register in which Marvel Thor stuff ever works and they don't hit it nearly as often as I'd wish.
Today's is a mixed batch on the rather nebulous theme of Someone On The Internet Said I Should Read This. Will the internet contradict itself? Let's find out!
How FMK works, short version: I am trying to clear out my unreads. So there is a poll, in which you get to pick F, M, or K. F means I should spend a night of wild passion with the book ASAP, and then decide whether to keep it or not. M means I should continue to commit to a long-term relationship of sharing my bedroom with it. K means it should go away immediately. Anyone can vote, you don't have to actually know anything about the books.
I pick a winner on Friday night (although won't actually close the poll, people can still vote,) and report results/post the new poll on the following Tuesday, and write a response to the F winner sometime in the next week.
Link to long version of explanation (on first poll)
I have not read any other new FMK this week because I have been catching up on comics and other stuff. Also I saw Thor 3! That was an EPICALLY silly movie. I approve. EPICALLY silly is the only register in which Marvel Thor stuff ever works and they don't hit it nearly as often as I'd wish.
Today's is a mixed batch on the rather nebulous theme of Someone On The Internet Said I Should Read This. Will the internet contradict itself? Let's find out!
How FMK works, short version: I am trying to clear out my unreads. So there is a poll, in which you get to pick F, M, or K. F means I should spend a night of wild passion with the book ASAP, and then decide whether to keep it or not. M means I should continue to commit to a long-term relationship of sharing my bedroom with it. K means it should go away immediately. Anyone can vote, you don't have to actually know anything about the books.
I pick a winner on Friday night (although won't actually close the poll, people can still vote,) and report results/post the new poll on the following Tuesday, and write a response to the F winner sometime in the next week.
Link to long version of explanation (on first poll)
Poll #19072 FMK #31: I heard it on the internet
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 61
Dawn by Octavia Butler (1987)
Homeland by Cory Doctorow (2013)
Half Magic by Edward Eager (1954)
Black Ships by Jo Graham (2008)
The Stepsister Scheme by Jim Hines (2009)
God Stalk by P. C. Hodgell (1982)
The Phantom Tollbooth by Norton Juster (1961)
The Doom That Came to Sarnath (anthology) by H. P. Lovecraft (1971)
First Test by Tamora Pierce (1999)
The Last of the Wine by Mary Renault (1956)
The Sparrow by Mary Doria Ruseell (1996)
Old Man's War by John Scalzi (2005)
Illuminatus! Part 1: The Eye in the Pyramid by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson (1975)
The Book of Lost Tales by J. R. R. Tolkien (1983)
The Thirteenth Child by Patricia C. Wrede (2009)
no subject
...in a good way.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I hated Old Man's War so much that I never read anything else by Scalzi other than his blog, which I like. Cool premise is totally ignored for the entire book, which is generic shoot 'em up in space with nothing that I enjoy in that genre.
I also hated The Sparrow. The plot element the entire story revolves around makes no sense, and many other plot elements also make no sense. Some cool ideas but generally manipulative and annoying.
Dawn is very good and thought-provoking, if dark/sad, with fascinating worldbuilding; also, tentacled aliens breeding humans!
I remember enjoying Half Magic, First Test, and The Phantom Tollbooth, but have not re-read recently.
no subject
But I remember that, when the third book came out, it was only available in a very limited print run from Meisha Merlin.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I also loved Half Magic and its sequels, but unlike the Juster I haven't reread those in a very long time, so I don't know if they've held up. But you should try them anyway.
I enjoyed Black Ships, but I wasn't OMG WILD about it. You might like it. You might not.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Love both Half Magic and Phantom Tollbooth, but I read both as a kid and can't unsee my kid's take.
Kill the Lovecraft, just on general principle. I think I read it, and found it as hot-air empty and overblown as everything else of his, but can't swear it was The Doom and not something else of his.
no subject
no subject
Basically, I'd only recommend it if you're wanting to do research on that particular bit of geeky fannish culture because it did yield things that became memes. They're just mostly memes that still piss me off thirty years later.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Scalzi, Hines, and Doctorow are all fine, but boring. Scalzi and Doctorow come across a bit as preachy liberal, and I haven't read the Doctorow in question, but I assume its the same.
I want you to read the Hodgell because people tell *me* to read her, and I want someone else to give me a report.
I got most of the way through Black Sails, but had to return it to the library. I enjoyed it but it didn't grab me.
no subject
no subject
I can't quite vote a K on it, because of such strong childhood nostalgia and how fun it is otherwise, but yeah, there are some lines/scenes that are definitely a thing.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
If the self-congratulatory, mansplaining tone doesn't get you, the transphobia, misogyny, and badly written sex probably will. If there is a 1970s equivalent to a pair of gamergaters egging each other into yelling cuck every 5 minutes and interspersing that with "ironic" discussions of topics they know nothing about (e.g., psychology, history, what it feels like for a woman when she has good sex), it is probably this book. Its primary purpose was to be funny, but it was just... not. Everything I didn't like about Neal Stephenson and Robert Heinlein was here, with none of the things I did like about those two.
If there is an antidote to this book, it's probably Octavia Butler. I find it ironic that she's also on the list. XD
(A note: I did suffer through the Schrodinger's Cat trilogy as well, because apparently I was incapable of resisting any book placed in front of me at that point. It was awful in similar yet slightly distinct ways.)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I forgot to vote on it but please add a "K" to Illuminatus! You can only read Wilson when you're young and perhaps less critical because so many things are new and you want to experience them or you're a bloke. It's only funny if you can ignore the overwhelming whitemanittude of it. Think Heinlein, but worse.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Dawn by Octavia Butler -- F
I've read multiple books by her and I haven't cared for them...but many people like her and you might, too.
Homeland by Cory Doctorow -- F
Haven't read anything of his, so he gets an F on the grounds that the book MIGHT be good.
Half Magic by Edward Eager -- M
Loved it as a kid. Can't really see it without nostalgia goggles.
Black Ships by Jo Graham -- F
I vacillated between F and M for this one. Everyone I know loves it, but I haven't read it. I went with F.
The Stepsister Scheme by Jim Hines -- F
I liked the idea of three fairy tale princesses as a team of secret agents, but I realize that it's not for everyone.
God Stalk by P.C. Hodgell -- F
Never heard of it. Since I know nothing bad about it, the book gets an F.
The Doom That Came to Sarnath (anthology) by H. P. Lovecraft -- F
I'm not crazy about Lovecraft, but I don't know anything about the stories in this anthology or how winceworthy they are. In case of ignorance, works get an F.
First Test by Tamora Pierce -- M
The first book in the Protector of the Small tetralogy! MARRY IT.
The Last of the Wine by Mary Renault -- F
Vacillated on this one, too. Finally went with F rather than M. (I have a lot of Renault fans on my F-list. I just haven't read the book.)
The Sparrow by Mary Doria Ruseell -- K
Tried to read it. HAAAAATED it. I would have thrown it in the garbage if it hadn't been a library book.
Old Man's War by John Scalzi -- F
Doesn't sound interesting to me, but it might be good.
lluminatus! Part 1: The Eye in the Pyramid by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson -- K
Everyone has told me that it's boring, pretentious and whiny. Rinkworks summarizes the entire trilogy like this:
"The Illuminati are a secret society that (DRUGS SEX DRUGS) control everything in the world (SEX DRUGS SEX) including all governments, financial institutions, and (DRUGS SEX DRUGS) intelligence agencies. No, they're not. Well, yes they are but not really. (SEX DRUGS SEX) They originated in Bavaria in 1776 (DRUGS SEX DRUGS). No, actually they go all the way back to Atlantis. No, (SEX DRUGS SEX) Atlantis never really existed. Yes it did. It's not just one society (DRUGS SEX DRUGS), it's a whole bunch of them (SEX DRUGS SEX) together. No, it's just one, and they go all the way back to Atlantis, which never (DRUGS SEX DRUGS) existed, oh yes it did. They've had an uninterrupted existence since 30,000 years ago (SEX DRUGS SEX) -- no they actually only go back as far as the 1800s (DRUGS SEX DRUGS). Fnord."
The Book of Lost Tales by J. R. R. Tolkien -- F
Haven't read it. It might be good.
The Thirteenth Child by Patricia C. Wrede -- K
Racefail 2.0 convinced me that a book that erases Native Americans from their own country isn't worth reading. (And I found more than a few problems with Wrede's worldbuilding questions, too.)
no subject
That summary of Illuminati looks very accurate for an SF book from the late 70s!
no subject
The Sparrow should die and die and die. It's just pages and pages of grimdark horribleness and I came out of reading it feeling a sort of formless despair that lasted for days afterwards. And the worldbuilding was completely not interesting enough to make up for that.
And oh, the Illuminatus... IDK. I read maybe a third of the first book back in my high school days and found it unintelligible enough that I gave up there, but I think you have more fortitude for that sort of thing. I voted F just because I want to see your reactions, but I ultimately don't think it's very good, as a book.
no subject
Wordplay, huh? I like a good pun but. ...maybe you have to get into Phantom Tollbooth *before* you have been burned out on Xanth.
Ugh, grimdark.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
In particular, The phantom tollbooth is great, it's almost in a league with Alice in Wonderland. Like Carroll it's properly surreal, not just goofy, and it's quite mathsy. It might be that you need to read it as a child to get the most out of it, but I thoroughly recommend it, and it's a short, light book besides.
The last of the wine is also awesome. I love Renault's gay ancient Greeks stuff, and this is probably the best of them as well as the gayest.
OTOH, The sparrow is, in my opinion, terrible, and reading it will make your life worse. It gets a lot of praise, and it's doing some original things, but one of the main things it got hyped for (including, I believe, the Tiptree award) is that a large part of the plot deals with rape, with the victim being male. Things that are good about it: it's a rare example of SF that really engages with real world Christianity and even theology. It has some interesting stuff about communicating with aliens. Things that are bad about it: everything else, omg. Terrible prose, terrible characterization, doesn't make sense, lots of rape and torture as a device to evoke emotions.
Several other opinions too, but those are the strongest.
no subject
Otherwise: I moderately enjoyed The Thirteenth Child when I read it (other than the lack of Native people thing), I moderately enjoyed Old Man's War when I read it, and Dawn was an objectively good book that I didn't like. Oh and I'm annoyed about Lovecraft stealing the name Sarnath from an important historic Buddhist site.
no subject
Half Magic: Loved this as a kid, agree about the racism fairy though. The best of the sequels is Knight's Castle, which IIRC stands alone pretty well and has few opportunities for the racism fairy to get a foothold. That one's basically Ivanhoe fanfic, which I would probably appreciate more if I'd ever read Ivanhoe, but I still really liked it.
The Phantom Tollbooth: I tried to read this as a kid, bounced very hard off of it for the same reasons I bounced off of Alice in Wonderland—I wasn't good with surrealism as a kid. A few years later I tried it again and liked it much better.
First Test: I'm more of an Emelan fan than a Tortall fan, but Kel is probably my single favorite of Pierce's heroines. I'm really fond of the cast in this series.
The Book of Lost Tales: I have read this. I remember literally nothing about it. I think I still have a copy in my bedroom.
The Thirteenth Child: I remember it as being restful and just on the edge of being boring. I mostly did like it, but have 0 desire to ever revisit the book.
Everything else I went by reputation, or title if I'd never heard of it or the author.
no subject