Meta links post
Every so often something goes around DW talking about how there aren't any good fannish discussions on DW (from younger fans) or how much
metafandom is missed1 (from older fans.)
Every time it happens I go "But there is tons of fandom discussion on DW! More than I can keep up with! It's all right there on my reading and network pages!"
I've been meaning for awhile to post a collection of Meta Posts That Wandered Across My Reading Page in X Time Period, as evidence thereof, and since I happened to have gotten a whole weekend behind and had a stash of tabs open, this seemed like a good day to do it. If you need more thoughtful fan discussion in your life, you could do worse than add some of these people.
So under the cut, DW meta posts that earned their own tabs in the last 24 hours. (This is not all the meta that went by, but sorry, people posting about shows and books I don't know, I may have skimmed your post. It is no reflection on the cleverness of your thinking.)
carmarthen: That Meta Essay About Polyamory In Fic
thatyourefuse: [proposal for a Vorkosigan Saga ficathon]
carmarthen: You know what fandom needs more of? [Answer: SCA AUs].
aethel: Alternative Library Literature 1992-1993
starlady: BBC Sherlock, and a question
petra: Psychic Wolves for Lupercalia: Pup of a Psychic Bitch (Year Two) - Brainstorm, Cheerlead, &c.
marginaliana: dentist - someone who does car body work [Top Gear RPF intro]
ysabetwordsmith In Which JSTOR Is A Vanity Press
brownbetty Fandoms I Have Loved [Fantasy of Competence stories]
naraht Thoughts on Generation Kill
beccaelizabeth Trying To Take Religion out of Fantasy Kingdoms
otw_news The Rebellious Pixels Chain of Takedowns
fandom_secrets: Secret Post #2203
kaz: Tolkien Meta is the Best Meta
doctor_and_master Discussion Question/Poll: What's your favourite Doctor/Master episode/serial?
(if you want your post off this list, of course, just ask.)
1I think there were problems with the way metafandom was working, especially by the end - mod burnout and the way it facilitated some bad aspects of mob behavior being two of them - but I miss having a good source for meta links outside my reading list. I have occasionally dreamed of there being a meta recs/links community that's sort of a combination of the way
fanart_recs,
bestthingever, and
poetry are run - people sign up to take a week, and during that week they post links to any interesting meta they should come across that week. It doesn't have to be the best meta, or all the meta, just the meta that they find interesting that week. And then next week it's somebody else, and a different perspective on what makes meta interesting.
It wouldn't solve all the problems with the metafandom model but I think it would bypass several of them. And it would be fun.
Of course if I started half the community ideas that I think might be fun, I would never do anything but start communities.
IN OTHER NEWS: I am messing with tag wrangling at the moment (and liveblogging it into the empty tagwranglers chatroom, if anybody wants to pop in and be entertained). One of the fandoms I have recently assigned myself (on the rule of "If you have written it and it has no wrangler, take it on") is British Comedian RPF.
However, I am having an issue with this fandom. That being: that it makes me unhappy to have to wrangle people like Dara Ó Briain and Ed Byrne (not to mention Rich Hall and Sandi Toksvig) as British Comedians.
I mean, they are unquestionably part of the British Comedy fandom - they do British-style comedy in British contexts with other people who do British comedy - but something in me still quails at calling Dara Ó Briain or Ed Byrne a British comedian. (I wouldn't, after all, call John Oliver an American comedian, even if he mostly does American comedy in America for Americans now.)
So, fellow British Comedy people who read this journal: what do you think? Is it worth the hassle of asking the higher-ups to change the fandom canonical to "British Comedy RPF" instead? Or does it bother nobody but me? Or is "British Comedy RPF" just as bad and I should change it to something else/wrangle the expats into the fandoms of their nationalities?
(There is an "Irish Comedian RPF" category but it currently has no people attached to it. And no wrangler.)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Every time it happens I go "But there is tons of fandom discussion on DW! More than I can keep up with! It's all right there on my reading and network pages!"
I've been meaning for awhile to post a collection of Meta Posts That Wandered Across My Reading Page in X Time Period, as evidence thereof, and since I happened to have gotten a whole weekend behind and had a stash of tabs open, this seemed like a good day to do it. If you need more thoughtful fan discussion in your life, you could do worse than add some of these people.
So under the cut, DW meta posts that earned their own tabs in the last 24 hours. (This is not all the meta that went by, but sorry, people posting about shows and books I don't know, I may have skimmed your post. It is no reflection on the cleverness of your thinking.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(if you want your post off this list, of course, just ask.)
1I think there were problems with the way metafandom was working, especially by the end - mod burnout and the way it facilitated some bad aspects of mob behavior being two of them - but I miss having a good source for meta links outside my reading list. I have occasionally dreamed of there being a meta recs/links community that's sort of a combination of the way
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
It wouldn't solve all the problems with the metafandom model but I think it would bypass several of them. And it would be fun.
Of course if I started half the community ideas that I think might be fun, I would never do anything but start communities.
IN OTHER NEWS: I am messing with tag wrangling at the moment (and liveblogging it into the empty tagwranglers chatroom, if anybody wants to pop in and be entertained). One of the fandoms I have recently assigned myself (on the rule of "If you have written it and it has no wrangler, take it on") is British Comedian RPF.
However, I am having an issue with this fandom. That being: that it makes me unhappy to have to wrangle people like Dara Ó Briain and Ed Byrne (not to mention Rich Hall and Sandi Toksvig) as British Comedians.
I mean, they are unquestionably part of the British Comedy fandom - they do British-style comedy in British contexts with other people who do British comedy - but something in me still quails at calling Dara Ó Briain or Ed Byrne a British comedian. (I wouldn't, after all, call John Oliver an American comedian, even if he mostly does American comedy in America for Americans now.)
So, fellow British Comedy people who read this journal: what do you think? Is it worth the hassle of asking the higher-ups to change the fandom canonical to "British Comedy RPF" instead? Or does it bother nobody but me? Or is "British Comedy RPF" just as bad and I should change it to something else/wrangle the expats into the fandoms of their nationalities?
(There is an "Irish Comedian RPF" category but it currently has no people attached to it. And no wrangler.)
no subject
no subject
(Although for the past few years, minus the occasional thing I really need for fic research, my rule has been that if they didn't care enough to make it open-access, it can't be that important. More and more, that's less sarcastic, actually true - several of the top-tier journals have been making their headline articles free to view on the web, and more and more people are mirroring their major paywalled papers up on their own webspaces (presumably with the permission of the journals that published them, although I have carefully never asked.) And of course the open-access journals and depositories have been getting better and better.)
no subject
(And yes, I agree that "British comedy RPF" makes more sense.)
no subject
(And good, although now I'm wondering if I'm losing my memory, because I thought I'd left some tags unwrangled in that fandom until I figured this out, and yet when I go there now, they're all nicely wrangled...)
no subject
I like the weekly dig up idea or, alternately, we could go back to a mega blog model, where people just drop meta posts...
no subject
By mega blog do you mean a place where people post their own meta, or a place where people can post meta recs whenever they want? I'm not sure how easy it would be to get the first model going - posting to something like that tends to make people feel like they have to do Serious Meta and Proper Essays, and that makes it a lot less that stuff will get posted. (Also fandom in general seems to be continuing to move even more toward everybody posting in their own space and linking around, rather than communal spaces. My feelings on the trend are mixed, but bucking trends is always harder.) I've wanted an active, open, welcoming "post any and all meta here" community since back when F_W was on LJ, though...
A free-recs community could work, although in my experience (unless you are very lucky) that model ends up being just a few really enthusiastic people doing all the work, anyway. (
no subject
Metablog was actually the precursor, so to speak. afai remember, anyone could post links, but yes, it was a different kind of animal.
By the time I left, we'd just installed a great software model via delicious (I know we used it for sga_newsletter too), but I have no idea what people use now...
Im' still thinking about how to get continuity and not have it rest on a few shoulders. Bc IMHE that's alway how it ends up...a few doing all the work and when they stop, it ends...
no subject
And what do you mean by "continuity"? I what I'm asking is - do you need continuity? With setups like crack_van and poetry , the "mods" basically just manage the sign-up list; everything else is up to the assigned part-timer. And there is a lot of variation in what gets posted and how, but I guess I see that as a feature, not a bug - if this week's reccer is into fandoms you hate and annoys you and posts in purple font*, next week's probably won't, etc. And if you start getting burnout in a small group, it's a lot easier to recruit new people to "post X things over one week" than "take on an indefinite obligation as a mod".
*okay I would probably ban purple font, yes.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(No, seriously, I would be all over that. I don't want to creep on several dozen strangers' individual journals just to get their periodic meta, but if you're buddies with them already, please, take advantage of it!)
no subject
I would totally be willing to do it for a week every few months, though! And other people could do it the other weeks! And we could all show off how awesome our own buddies are!
no subject
Maybe with Doctor Who-related links crossposted to
no subject
(There was a thing said once by
no subject
no subject
How integrated to Wordpress is the Diigo-to-wordpress thingy? I bet it would be possible to hack something together that would let you repurpose the post-by-email system to do it, if nothing else... I'm pretty sure that's how people use LoudTwitter on DW.
no subject
The crossposting was all set up on Diigo's site, and can be sent from there to multiple blogging platforms (so far including LJ, but not DW). It's not very sophisticated; I would like it to automatically post every two weeks, for instance, but the only options are daily, weekly, and semiweekly. But it works well enough for my purposes. Would be great if someone could build on it.
no subject
(and maybe get DW to set some sort of permisson flag on their end to let Diigo in? But I suspect DW would be willing to do that. Actually, "allow Diigo to crosspost to DW" might be something you could put in
no subject
no subject
In the meantime, you should be able to see only Maggie Sr. through the Margaret Gwendolyn LeFay Dresden tag. Maggie Jr. is tangled up in the metatag at the moment, but it should be an easy fix. (Unfortunately, the just plain "Maggie Dresden" tag is always going to be mixed, because we can't know which Maggie the author meant when they used it.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Besides, you wouldn't have time to read metafandom anyway. Man that was a timesuck when it was at its height.)
no subject
I would support this as a wrangler and a fan.
(It's not obvious but those hands are Stephen Fry's playing Oscar Wilde so it's a most pertinent icon, really.)
no subject
no subject
On the other hand, though, my worry with 'British Comedy RPF' (this is something that
Just brainstorming here, but what about an abbreviation, like BritCom RPF? If you don't spell it out, then people can read it as they choose...
no subject
I don't know that I'm all that worried about something like Red Dwarf RPF showing up? I mean, a lot of them do sitcom work too, and Craig Charles (fr. ex.) does stand-up etc., so I don't know that there's a bright line, and I don't know that the current metatag ought to exclude sitcom RPF anyway. (Actually there are a lot more individual-show fandom tags that really should be subtagged to it, but aren't; I've been putting that off too until I figure out how I feel about the name thing.)
I personally would be happy with something like "British panel comedy RPF" since that's what I watch, but that's not really the point of the metatag.
I definitely wouldn't go with "Britcom", though, since some American PBS stations use that to refer specifically to the sitcoms. Are there any other suggestions you know of?
no subject
no subject
I'll put it through the mailing list, but I thought I'd sound it out here first, since I have collected a lot of British Comedy writers already :D
no subject
I feel like there was an earlier discussion about nationality and RPF, but I can't remember. At this point, I feel like most of the discussions are ones we've had before.
no subject
But I agree about your crack-van model; I think that would work really well, possibly combined with a sticky post (like for fandom wank et al) where anons & mice who don't want to rec things can still leave links to meta and relevant articles. That way reccers can also go check out the link post to see if there's anything there they want to rec.
And, hm, a facility for discussion-type posts, where you have a call-response with someone else's meta and your own meta post responding to it.
Oh, I want this so much. I don't suppose you'd want to co-mod a comm with me? ::g:: (And actually, that's a surprisingly serious offer; I really do want a meta comm on DW that'll last.)
no subject
no subject
Basically I just want stories about Joshua Bell and Edgar Meyer and Yo Yo Ma and Bela Fleck and Chris Thile and Mark O'Connor hanging out.
In any case, would British Panel Comedy RPF make more sense as your fandom name? I mean, it may not 100% capture the people you want in it, but it should capture the vast majority and exclude other kinds of British Comedians?