melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)
melannen ([personal profile] melannen) wrote2010-01-16 03:46 pm

Science, y'all.

ETA early morning jan 18: a short follow-up with more poll numbers + things /ETA

I was going to wait and post this later, with a much more elaborate stastistical work-up, population variables and meta-analysis - because I think it's interesting in its own right - but the ongoing conversation I'm seeing, and the extremely clear result I'm getting, is making me think it's more important to get the facts out there, than to make them pretty.

So: Are slashers straight?

I spent an afternoon and evening finding all of the polls & surveys of slash demographics I could that included a question on sexuality. Some I already had bookmarked, some I found through google, delicious, and following citations in academic papers. I'm sure there are more out there, and if you have links to more more polls I would love to add their data to my analysis. But you know what? The results of the ones I've found are pretty consistent, across a large range of survey population. And it is, to be quite honest, not the result I was expecting, even as a slasher who does not herself identify as straight, and is used to finding people like her in fandom.

Are slashers straight?


I present to you the raw numbers on sexuality for the 10 polls & surveys I could find results for, plus several more I could only find references to.

You'll note that there are a variety of categories used for sexuality; for the purposes of the meta-analysis, I am counting as "straight" any poll answer that was straight, heterosexual, primarily heterosexual, heteroflexible, or direct equivalent. I am using "queer" as shorthand for everybody else, including people who self-identified as bi-leaning-straight, questioning, and asexual. (You'll also note that the polls that included options beyond gay, straight, and bi had *significant* numbers of participants choosing them, something you might want to consider in general when talking about fans' sexuality. Just fyi.)

I only listed gender statistics for a few of the polls. That's because I'm lazy, and the way LJ polls work, separating out the responses by gender wouldn't have been terribly meaningful without a lot of annoying hand-collating anyway, so for the record: any poll with no gender statistics here either had no gender question, or over 90% self-identified women respondents. As this analysis is mostly meant to address the question of slashers' sexuality, I'm leaving gender identity unexamined for the quick'n'dirty version. (Though I'll note that only one of the polls had options specifically involving non-gender-binary people and orientation. Other possibilities, fandom: they exist.)

http://www.libraryofmoria.com/jsr/part2.html#21
2003
Library of Moria, a LOTR fic archive
Participants: 275
Heterosexual: 124
Mostly Heterosexual: 39
Bisexual: 84
Mostly Homosexual: 0
Homosexual: 10
Undecided: 6
Non-sexual: 2
Percent identified as queer: 37%

http://rushlight75.livejournal.com/38193.html
2003-10-14
Pre-metafandom, but widely distributed through its precursors
Participants: 1000
Male: 26
Female: 974
Only result available is an average Kinsey Scale rating: 1.8
(which kind of comes out to 40% queer, but not really)

http://idroppedarice.livejournal.com/59133.html
7-28-2004
Harry Potter slashers, by way of Fiction Alley Park
365 participants
straight: 173
bi: 119
gay: 22
undecided: 49
Percent identified as queer: 52.7%

http://lavinialavender.livejournal.com/179885.html
4-28-2005
locked, but currently available through Google's cache; mostly HP and anime slashers
participants: 203
straight: 85
gay: 8
bi: 73
Confused: 36
Percent identifying as queer: 54.6%

http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/242137/results
2006-2-13
posted by Proserpina "For the yaoi girls", but I have no idea where it was linked/promoted.
total: 43
heterosexual: 23
homosexual: 1
bisexual: 11
pansexual: 2
asexual: 1
unsure: 5
Percent identifying as queer: 53% 47%

http://hederahelix.livejournal.com/259632.html
6-29-2006
Mostly the metafandom crowd; specifically slash-focused.
Participants: 402
Heterosexual: 35
Heterosexual but slasher: 62
Bisexual, but heterosexual in practice: 102
Bisexual: 128
Bisexual, but queer in practice: 26
Lesbian, gay, queer, etc but slasher: 30
Lesbian, gay, queer, etc: 19
Percent identified as queer: 76%

http://wisdomeagle.livejournal.com/931805.html
February 2, 2007
Mostly the metafandom crowd; not all slashers - includes het & gen fans.
469 participants
straight women: 206
bi/omni/pansexual women: 186
lesbians: 56
asexual: 30
Straight men: 10
bi men: 5
Gay men: 3
Percent participants who identify as queer: 59.7%

http://jadelennox.livejournal.com/265022.html
Feb 7, 2007
A small poll of one fan writer's circle, not specifically fandom-focused:
Participants: 35
straight: 8
gay: 1
bisexual: 10
sligtly bisexual (kinsey 1 or 5): 9
other: 5
Percent participants who identified as queer: 71%

http://sailorptah.dreamwidth.org/11270.html
Feb 13, 2008
Mostly the metafandom & anime crowd, but not specifically fandom-focused; a freeform survey which emphasized complex & fluid sexuality
Total participants: 71
Identified as some subset of queer: 60
Percent participants who identified as queer: 84.5%

http://kleenexwoman.livejournal.com/248586.html
2-12-2008
Mostly the metafandom crowd, but with some exposure outside it
Participants: 577
gay: 25
bi-leaning-gay: 47
bi: 62
pan: 76
bi-leaning-straight: 84
straight: 192
asexual: 37
other: 23
no labels: 31
Percent identifying as queer: 66.7%

Polls whose results are not included in this analysis:

There are two other polls on FAP, but they were free-response threads and I'd've had to collate the results by hand, which I didn't have time for: http://forums.fictionalley.org/park/showthread.php?s=f041f722f3998ddd1bfbc6055d650507&threadid=19455&highlight=slash+survey and http://forums.fictionalley.org/park/showthread.phps=f041f722f3998ddd1bfbc6055d650507&threadid=133998&highlight=slash+survey

...it's on my list.

[personal profile] blnchflr ran a poll through metafandom sometime in early February, 2007, which was deleted, originally at: http://skuf.livejournal.com/132143.html . The only data I could find was a reference that it was "running closer to just 35% saying they are "strictly het".

I found several fandom demographics polls pre-dating 2003, but none of them had a sexuality question, which is interesting in its own right. (I suspect that the farther you go back in slash's history, the less likely it is that we would have even dared to ask these questions, and the less likely we would have gotten accurate answers, if we did. And in a time when fanfic was getting a *lot* of flak from the straight world, presenting an image to outsiders of "ordinary housewives" was important. I think the time when we need that protective image is fading.)

Finally, Wikipedia's reference for saying that "polls claim most slashers are heterosexual women", which has propagated everywhere, is Anne Kustritz's paper "Slashing the Romance Narrative", first published in the Journal of Amercan Culture in 2003, available in pdf here: http://www.laurientaylor.org/research/sources/slashfic.pdf . She, in turns, cites three informal fandom essays in her fandom demographics section, which is only a small part of the paper - those three essays are no more or less rigorous or inclusive than the 11 I have analysed here, note. The first is a clearly parodic essay on the Sith Academy, http://www.siubhan.com/sithacademy/criticalintro.html , which uses no poll or survey data, and does not even touch on the question of slashers' sexuality (despite Kustritz' citation implying it does.) The second is given the URL http://www.apps4.vantagenet.com/zpolls/count.asp?rlt=91221204045&id=91221204045 , which was a poll of the Darth Maul Estrogen Brigade in 2000. It is no longer available online, nor can I find any other references to it remaining online. The second was at http://www.sockii.com/ma/criticalintro.htm ; it is also no longer online, and I can find no details on it whatsoever except the date given of 1999, though the URL + the other references in the paper strongly imply that it was limited to TPM fandom, like the others.

(I will also note, because it seems worth noting, that the demographics section of that paper was very strongly trying to make the point that slashers are NICE WELL-ADJUSTED WOMEN WHO ARE NOT DEVIANT OR SCARY, so I am inclined to think the author had a bias toward categorizing slashers as heterosexual, especially as she uses the phrase "mostly to totally heterosexual" in the passage with the citation, but does not qualify heterosexual anywhere else. There is a lot of wiggle room in "mostly", as the variety of categories in the polls I listed above demonstrate. ...also, I @#$%&^@$ hate wikipedia's goddamn paternalistic notability and citation rules, since it means those two ten-year-old Phantom Menace polls somehow turned into GOSPEL TRUTH on the way to the printing press.)

So, over 9 polls, in a variety of slash subfandoms from the late-teens yaoi set to the mid-thirties meta fans set, dates ranging over 7 years. Only onetwo polls had less than 50% queer participants, and that wasone of them the earliest one, and even they were at 37% and 47%. The median percent of queer participants was 59.7%, and the mean was 61.5% 60.8%.

SO when people say things like "slash fans are appropriating queer experience", what THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER hear is either "you aren't queer enough, your queer identity isn't real" or "male voices are the only ones qualified to speak for the queer community."

I think the question of how queer women can appropriate queer men's identity, and the damage that can be done when gay men speaking about themselves are drowned out by women, are valid discussion topics, and worth addressing. That is not a conversation that is going to happen as long as THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER, are being erased from the discussion. fyi.

And SO when people say things like "slash is a legitimate way for straight women to express their sexuality", what THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER hear is either "you aren't queer enough, your queer identity isn't relevant" or "straight voices are the only ones qualified to speak for the slash community".

I think the question of how straight women's sexuality interacts with queer sexuality, and the ways straight women's sexuality defines slash, are valid discussion topics, and worth addressing. That is not a conversation that is going to happen as long as THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER, are being erased from the discussion. fyi.

Can I say that one more time? I like saying it. Science makes me happy.

THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER.

ETA: People in comments have pointed out math errors that change the numbers slightly: I've added corrections in the relevant places. The conclusions still stand, however (for now.)

ETA 2 early morning jan 18: a short follow-up with more poll numbers + things /ETA 2
undomielregina: Rusyuna from the anime Grenadier text: "Grenadier" (Default)

[personal profile] undomielregina 2010-01-18 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
I'm here from linkspam, and I'd really like to agree and thank you for making this point. I've been about two seconds away from making a really melodramatic "world, I guess you're right and I'll start calling myself straight because obviously my own self-identification is meaningless" type of post. At the same time, I worry that I'm exhibiting privilege in that I'm able to pass and so demanding that spaces welcome me even though I don't "need" a space to be safe.

I think I wouldn't be so angry about this if LGBT spaces didn't indicate that I was welcome (it's right there in the acronym!) and then freeze me out when I actually try to enter them. As a result, I've started to think a lot about the ways in which identifying as gay or lesbian and being accepted into those spaces is more about accepting certain cultural values rather than simple self-identification of sexual orientation.
Edited 2010-01-18 04:50 (UTC)
ext_58378: proof of bisexuality by taking the integral of sex over the entire line (Default)

[identity profile] maryaminx.livejournal.com 2010-01-18 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
Via somewhere.

This surprised me; despite most of the people I've come into contact with in fandom being some form of queer I still considered straight (cis) female to be at least 80% of slashdom. This makes me very happy. (And makes the "slash is always appropriation!" argument more wtf than ever.)
amaresu: Sapphire and Steel from the opening (Default)

[personal profile] amaresu 2010-01-18 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
And I write a decent amount of slash and haven't considered myself a slasher in years. *shrug*
espreite: (Default)

Here via Metafandom

[personal profile] espreite 2010-01-18 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
First of all, as a statistics fan/geek/person, you make me yay for doing this whole analysis. I hang out mostly in the fakenews fandom, which I'd always got the impression was more queer-populated than most fandoms, but wow! This is really awesome to see the facts laid out, and I hope it comes up more and changes how the context of the slash conversation is viewed.

only one of the polls had options specifically involving non-gender-binary people and orientation. Other possibilities, fandom: they exist. Heh. As a nonbinary asexual person, I've been watching this whole debate going, "...I don't even know where I fit into all of this."

Um, and also, you appear to be rather awesome and we seem to have some interests in common, so I think I will add you, if you don't mind. :)
edenfalling: stylized black-and-white line art of a sunset over water (Default)

[personal profile] edenfalling 2010-01-18 05:44 am (UTC)(link)
When you say,

"I am a $GENDERCATEGORY and I am/have been attracted to:
0, opposite sex only
1, opposite sex mostly
2, opposite sex more than same sex
3, same and opposite sex equally
4, same sex more than opposite sex
5, same sex mostly
6, same sex only
*, Pansexual, sapiosexual, and other sexual attractions without regard to gender (Kinsey "YES")
X, asexual, nonsexual, and other forms of Kinsey "NO"
?, none of these options come close
_, decline to answer"

how are you defining attraction? Sexual attraction, romantic attraction, or non-romantic-non-sexual-yet-on-the-same-level-of-intimacy attraction? Because all three exist, and they are not the same thing (though they may often overlap).
gwenfrankenstien: Cartoon version of Mattell's Frankie Stein doll, the teen daughter of Frankenstein's monster (comic-book lesbians)

Here from Metafandom

[personal profile] gwenfrankenstien 2010-01-18 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
THANK YOU for this. "Straight middle-aged, middle-class housewives" or whatever the conventional wisdom is has never been my fandom experience at all, it's nice to see numbers to back that up.
attackfish: Yshre girl wearing a kippah, text "Attackfish" (Default)

[personal profile] attackfish 2010-01-18 06:14 am (UTC)(link)
THANK YOU!

Here via Metafandom

[personal profile] sakru909 2010-01-18 06:20 am (UTC)(link)
This post is awesome and you are awesome for making it. Most of the slashers I know, including myself, don't really identify as 100% straight.
amalnahurriyeh: XF: Mulder in Elvis glasses, with text "fierce" (fierce)

[personal profile] amalnahurriyeh 2010-01-18 07:45 am (UTC)(link)
So this is brilliant and data and yay, etc. I'm particularly interested in the way the shortness of internet generations is skewing data--ten year old data is basically useless at this point, even if many of the same people are involved, because the broader grouping has just moved on. (I also cheer you on with the getting-this-shit-published thing, because, citable data yay!).

Tangential note, and little to do with the original question: has anybody counted how many het fangirls/fen are queer? I ask because I hang out in mainly het-oriented circles (everybody started out in X-Files, nearly all as Mulder/Scully shippers, though some are primarily in other fandoms now), and, holy hell, there's a lot of queer on my flist. It's brilliant, and feeds into my (not-so-)faint separatist leanings. I think I might have to do a pollish thing on this subject myself.
amycat: smug-looking cat, wearing glasses & reading a book (Default)

[personal profile] amycat 2010-01-18 09:13 am (UTC)(link)
"I certainly wouldn't have wanted to join something called an estrogen brigade..."

I was on an "estrogen brigade" fan-list once, and HATED the name... but liked the List and the character we squee'd for. IIRC, a lot of the List-members there would've self-identified as something other than "Straight". (Certainly, if liking/being turned on by m/m fic can be cited as proof of a sexuality that's outside the "Straight" norm, I'd be "bent" and so would LOTS of my online friends!)

And if the Religious Right wanted to draw a line between "Queer" and "Straight", I'd be wearing my loudest rainbow-tie-dyed shirt and standing on the "Queer" side in solidarity with all my friends... "Queer" and "Straight" can be as much about mindset as about one's actual sexual experiences...
torachan: (Default)

[personal profile] torachan 2010-01-18 09:17 am (UTC)(link)
Standing in solidarity is one thing, but I am really uncomfortable with arguments like "I like slash, so therefore I'm queer".
nic: (Default)

[personal profile] nic 2010-01-18 09:51 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you.

This correlates with my experience in a real-life slash group; where not only was there a 'token gay boy' but there was also the 'token straight girl'.
nic: (Default)

Re: Here from Metafandom

[personal profile] nic 2010-01-18 09:55 am (UTC)(link)
"Straight middle-aged, middle-class housewives"

I think this is what slash fans USED to be, because getting married and becoming a housewife was what you did. Even if someone was queer, culture would have encouraged them to follow the marriage path.

I think of the housewives writing Star Trek slash in the 70's... if they were in fandom today, they'd probably be living a very different lifestyle while still embedded in fandom!
jame_alec: A young Magneto and Professor X looking at each other. Magneto has a snazzy hat on (Default)

[personal profile] jame_alec 2010-01-18 10:21 am (UTC)(link)
1: Entirely female except for one participant.

2: 2.6% male.

3: 3.6% male.

4: 1.0% male.

5: Advertised as for women that like yaoi, so I'm going with the assumption no men participated.

6: 2.5% male.

7: 3.68% male

8: Gender not specified.

9: Not in poll form, I honestly do not have the time or inclination to weed through the comments.

10: Again, no gender specified.

I'd just like to point out that even if every guy that responded in those polls is gay and write stuff rather than just reading stuff... they don't make up more than 4% of the slash writers out there according to the numbers you put up here.

I think you are seriously downplaying the issue of someone other than queer men appropriating the experiences of queer men in slash. 96% of slash being written by women? It doesn't matter if 90% of them are queer, it's still appropriative.

[personal profile] hivesofactivity 2010-01-18 10:59 am (UTC)(link)
I think this is fascinating, and I am grateful for the work you've put into this!
nagia: (ffvii; cid; cid highwind is abusive love)

[personal profile] nagia 2010-01-18 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Here via metafandom, and not an M/M slasher, but it is really excellent to see the numbers behind the thing I've been picking up on subconsciously over in anime and videogame fandom. It's always seemed that almost all of the people I know through fandom identify as queer--but that didn't seem possible, since EVERYBODY knew fandom (and slash fandom in particular) was straight.

I kept thinking that maybe other forms of slash fandom were different, maybe the straight really was in the fandoms I wasn't in.

[personal profile] anivad 2010-01-18 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for this post. I'd always wondered about the numbers, seeing as how every single one of the first few slash writers I knew were queer.

- a heteroaesthetic heterophysical homoromantic asexual genderqueer
acrimonyastraea: (Default)

[personal profile] acrimonyastraea 2010-01-18 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi, here from Linkspam (and the post was shared with me on my reader by a friend). Love the post, and this comment is perfect. I'm really in yaoi fandom and not slash, but there is a lot of overlap and this reflects my experience in the little section of fandom I'm part of.
acrimonyastraea: (Default)

[personal profile] acrimonyastraea 2010-01-18 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I completely relate to this. I've never felt like part of the LGBTQ community, even though I identify as queer or bisexual and even though I support LGBTQ causes. Fandom, and my group of queer fandom friends, has definitely given me the room to figure myself out that I didn't feel like I had anywhere else.
ceri: (Default)

[personal profile] ceri 2010-01-18 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
This is really encouraging stuff.

A suggestion, if at some point you do go mad and prepare a for-true survey: ask about the extent to which participants identify themselves as more or less queer over time, and how strongly this shows in their lives. I know that for me, the time spent on queer fic felt at first like a simple escape, and then more and more like it was truer emotionally than the presentation I made to the world, and played a part in my eventually identifying to myself and then to the world that I wasn't what I'd thought, and moving out about it. I don't know how common that is but I'm sure it's not a unique experience.
parhelion: Archie Goodwin/meganbmoore (Archie-gun)

(Late-breaking note from metafandom)

[personal profile] parhelion 2010-01-18 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
To the best of my (limited) knowledge, a huge chunk of the m/m original slash writers came out of slash fandom communities and many still belong to them. (I do!) Also, at least some of us are queer; I'm 90% lesbian and am married to another woman. The three m/m original writers I have some personal acquaintance with are all queer, representing a colorful assortment of genders and sexualities, as are some (most?) of the professionals at my publisher.

I don't think anyone really knows what's going on demographically with the original slash community. I don't think anyone has checked. Instead, somebody, somewhere got a notion about heteronormative writers some time ago based on a couple of audible individuals and groups and has been running hard with it ever since. And there's been no rush to correct the errors for one reason or another. The fact that the genre's writers are still fighting to be allowed to join the romance writer's association might be a relevant example of a reason; there's been different battles going on up until now.

The resulting feeling is odd, kind of like being back in the seventies when everyone was making assorted assumptions about my sexuality except for me. I'll admit to having spent a lot of time being annoyed recently...
acrimonyastraea: (Default)

[personal profile] acrimonyastraea 2010-01-18 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Your definition would include yaoi in the definition of slash, and yet one of the frustrations I've experienced in this whole discussion is that yaoi has pretty much either been not considered, or has been dismissed as those silly little fangirls are the real homophobes, don't look at us slashers.

I think it's worth considering how you want to deal with yaoi, whether you want it to be included or you want to look at it separately.
acrimonyastraea: (Default)

[personal profile] acrimonyastraea 2010-01-18 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I think unfortunately a lot of how queer sexuality is presented is based on How to convince straight people we're not that bad. Which has a lot of historical necessity and practicality behind it, but provides limited framing.

And then, a lot of it also is based on gay male sexuality due to male privilege and misogyny. So yeah, I hope someday we can get past all of that baggage.
parhelion: Archie Goodwin/meganbmoore (Archie-gun)

Yet another metafandom drive-by

[personal profile] parhelion 2010-01-18 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I hope you don't mind my being a bit grateful you didn't clarify immediately since you helped me articulate thoughts I've been having about all these assorted wanks and talk-talks since they broke out. Wow: all these discussion about who's writing and reading what belonging to whom, and nobody really knows the demographics involved.

Now I want a macro of Kinsey saying, "Still haven't caught up with me, have you?"

Page 7 of 11