melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)
melannen ([personal profile] melannen) wrote2010-01-16 03:46 pm

Science, y'all.

ETA early morning jan 18: a short follow-up with more poll numbers + things /ETA

I was going to wait and post this later, with a much more elaborate stastistical work-up, population variables and meta-analysis - because I think it's interesting in its own right - but the ongoing conversation I'm seeing, and the extremely clear result I'm getting, is making me think it's more important to get the facts out there, than to make them pretty.

So: Are slashers straight?

I spent an afternoon and evening finding all of the polls & surveys of slash demographics I could that included a question on sexuality. Some I already had bookmarked, some I found through google, delicious, and following citations in academic papers. I'm sure there are more out there, and if you have links to more more polls I would love to add their data to my analysis. But you know what? The results of the ones I've found are pretty consistent, across a large range of survey population. And it is, to be quite honest, not the result I was expecting, even as a slasher who does not herself identify as straight, and is used to finding people like her in fandom.

Are slashers straight?


I present to you the raw numbers on sexuality for the 10 polls & surveys I could find results for, plus several more I could only find references to.

You'll note that there are a variety of categories used for sexuality; for the purposes of the meta-analysis, I am counting as "straight" any poll answer that was straight, heterosexual, primarily heterosexual, heteroflexible, or direct equivalent. I am using "queer" as shorthand for everybody else, including people who self-identified as bi-leaning-straight, questioning, and asexual. (You'll also note that the polls that included options beyond gay, straight, and bi had *significant* numbers of participants choosing them, something you might want to consider in general when talking about fans' sexuality. Just fyi.)

I only listed gender statistics for a few of the polls. That's because I'm lazy, and the way LJ polls work, separating out the responses by gender wouldn't have been terribly meaningful without a lot of annoying hand-collating anyway, so for the record: any poll with no gender statistics here either had no gender question, or over 90% self-identified women respondents. As this analysis is mostly meant to address the question of slashers' sexuality, I'm leaving gender identity unexamined for the quick'n'dirty version. (Though I'll note that only one of the polls had options specifically involving non-gender-binary people and orientation. Other possibilities, fandom: they exist.)

http://www.libraryofmoria.com/jsr/part2.html#21
2003
Library of Moria, a LOTR fic archive
Participants: 275
Heterosexual: 124
Mostly Heterosexual: 39
Bisexual: 84
Mostly Homosexual: 0
Homosexual: 10
Undecided: 6
Non-sexual: 2
Percent identified as queer: 37%

http://rushlight75.livejournal.com/38193.html
2003-10-14
Pre-metafandom, but widely distributed through its precursors
Participants: 1000
Male: 26
Female: 974
Only result available is an average Kinsey Scale rating: 1.8
(which kind of comes out to 40% queer, but not really)

http://idroppedarice.livejournal.com/59133.html
7-28-2004
Harry Potter slashers, by way of Fiction Alley Park
365 participants
straight: 173
bi: 119
gay: 22
undecided: 49
Percent identified as queer: 52.7%

http://lavinialavender.livejournal.com/179885.html
4-28-2005
locked, but currently available through Google's cache; mostly HP and anime slashers
participants: 203
straight: 85
gay: 8
bi: 73
Confused: 36
Percent identifying as queer: 54.6%

http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/242137/results
2006-2-13
posted by Proserpina "For the yaoi girls", but I have no idea where it was linked/promoted.
total: 43
heterosexual: 23
homosexual: 1
bisexual: 11
pansexual: 2
asexual: 1
unsure: 5
Percent identifying as queer: 53% 47%

http://hederahelix.livejournal.com/259632.html
6-29-2006
Mostly the metafandom crowd; specifically slash-focused.
Participants: 402
Heterosexual: 35
Heterosexual but slasher: 62
Bisexual, but heterosexual in practice: 102
Bisexual: 128
Bisexual, but queer in practice: 26
Lesbian, gay, queer, etc but slasher: 30
Lesbian, gay, queer, etc: 19
Percent identified as queer: 76%

http://wisdomeagle.livejournal.com/931805.html
February 2, 2007
Mostly the metafandom crowd; not all slashers - includes het & gen fans.
469 participants
straight women: 206
bi/omni/pansexual women: 186
lesbians: 56
asexual: 30
Straight men: 10
bi men: 5
Gay men: 3
Percent participants who identify as queer: 59.7%

http://jadelennox.livejournal.com/265022.html
Feb 7, 2007
A small poll of one fan writer's circle, not specifically fandom-focused:
Participants: 35
straight: 8
gay: 1
bisexual: 10
sligtly bisexual (kinsey 1 or 5): 9
other: 5
Percent participants who identified as queer: 71%

http://sailorptah.dreamwidth.org/11270.html
Feb 13, 2008
Mostly the metafandom & anime crowd, but not specifically fandom-focused; a freeform survey which emphasized complex & fluid sexuality
Total participants: 71
Identified as some subset of queer: 60
Percent participants who identified as queer: 84.5%

http://kleenexwoman.livejournal.com/248586.html
2-12-2008
Mostly the metafandom crowd, but with some exposure outside it
Participants: 577
gay: 25
bi-leaning-gay: 47
bi: 62
pan: 76
bi-leaning-straight: 84
straight: 192
asexual: 37
other: 23
no labels: 31
Percent identifying as queer: 66.7%

Polls whose results are not included in this analysis:

There are two other polls on FAP, but they were free-response threads and I'd've had to collate the results by hand, which I didn't have time for: http://forums.fictionalley.org/park/showthread.php?s=f041f722f3998ddd1bfbc6055d650507&threadid=19455&highlight=slash+survey and http://forums.fictionalley.org/park/showthread.phps=f041f722f3998ddd1bfbc6055d650507&threadid=133998&highlight=slash+survey

...it's on my list.

[personal profile] blnchflr ran a poll through metafandom sometime in early February, 2007, which was deleted, originally at: http://skuf.livejournal.com/132143.html . The only data I could find was a reference that it was "running closer to just 35% saying they are "strictly het".

I found several fandom demographics polls pre-dating 2003, but none of them had a sexuality question, which is interesting in its own right. (I suspect that the farther you go back in slash's history, the less likely it is that we would have even dared to ask these questions, and the less likely we would have gotten accurate answers, if we did. And in a time when fanfic was getting a *lot* of flak from the straight world, presenting an image to outsiders of "ordinary housewives" was important. I think the time when we need that protective image is fading.)

Finally, Wikipedia's reference for saying that "polls claim most slashers are heterosexual women", which has propagated everywhere, is Anne Kustritz's paper "Slashing the Romance Narrative", first published in the Journal of Amercan Culture in 2003, available in pdf here: http://www.laurientaylor.org/research/sources/slashfic.pdf . She, in turns, cites three informal fandom essays in her fandom demographics section, which is only a small part of the paper - those three essays are no more or less rigorous or inclusive than the 11 I have analysed here, note. The first is a clearly parodic essay on the Sith Academy, http://www.siubhan.com/sithacademy/criticalintro.html , which uses no poll or survey data, and does not even touch on the question of slashers' sexuality (despite Kustritz' citation implying it does.) The second is given the URL http://www.apps4.vantagenet.com/zpolls/count.asp?rlt=91221204045&id=91221204045 , which was a poll of the Darth Maul Estrogen Brigade in 2000. It is no longer available online, nor can I find any other references to it remaining online. The second was at http://www.sockii.com/ma/criticalintro.htm ; it is also no longer online, and I can find no details on it whatsoever except the date given of 1999, though the URL + the other references in the paper strongly imply that it was limited to TPM fandom, like the others.

(I will also note, because it seems worth noting, that the demographics section of that paper was very strongly trying to make the point that slashers are NICE WELL-ADJUSTED WOMEN WHO ARE NOT DEVIANT OR SCARY, so I am inclined to think the author had a bias toward categorizing slashers as heterosexual, especially as she uses the phrase "mostly to totally heterosexual" in the passage with the citation, but does not qualify heterosexual anywhere else. There is a lot of wiggle room in "mostly", as the variety of categories in the polls I listed above demonstrate. ...also, I @#$%&^@$ hate wikipedia's goddamn paternalistic notability and citation rules, since it means those two ten-year-old Phantom Menace polls somehow turned into GOSPEL TRUTH on the way to the printing press.)

So, over 9 polls, in a variety of slash subfandoms from the late-teens yaoi set to the mid-thirties meta fans set, dates ranging over 7 years. Only onetwo polls had less than 50% queer participants, and that wasone of them the earliest one, and even they were at 37% and 47%. The median percent of queer participants was 59.7%, and the mean was 61.5% 60.8%.

SO when people say things like "slash fans are appropriating queer experience", what THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER hear is either "you aren't queer enough, your queer identity isn't real" or "male voices are the only ones qualified to speak for the queer community."

I think the question of how queer women can appropriate queer men's identity, and the damage that can be done when gay men speaking about themselves are drowned out by women, are valid discussion topics, and worth addressing. That is not a conversation that is going to happen as long as THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER, are being erased from the discussion. fyi.

And SO when people say things like "slash is a legitimate way for straight women to express their sexuality", what THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER hear is either "you aren't queer enough, your queer identity isn't relevant" or "straight voices are the only ones qualified to speak for the slash community".

I think the question of how straight women's sexuality interacts with queer sexuality, and the ways straight women's sexuality defines slash, are valid discussion topics, and worth addressing. That is not a conversation that is going to happen as long as THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER, are being erased from the discussion. fyi.

Can I say that one more time? I like saying it. Science makes me happy.

THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER.

ETA: People in comments have pointed out math errors that change the numbers slightly: I've added corrections in the relevant places. The conclusions still stand, however (for now.)

ETA 2 early morning jan 18: a short follow-up with more poll numbers + things /ETA 2
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-01-17 09:41 am (UTC)(link)
Please to rate how important the following factors are for you in your selection of fannish entertainment:

Someone of the same gender identity as me
Someone of the same gender identity and sexual orientation as me
A character I find physically attractive
A character I find emotionally attractive
A pairing where I find both/most/all characters physically attractive
A pairing where I find both/most/all characters emotionally attractive
A pairing where the characters are well-suited to each other with little to no further development or changes from their source material
Familiar source material
Familiar pairing
Familiar/trusted author
Familiar tropes evident in prompt/summary
pine: credit: hatman (Dreamsheep_ShpgTog_w_Pride)

THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER.

[personal profile] pine 2010-01-17 11:14 am (UTC)(link)
I feel so much less lonely now! :D :D :D Thank you for this.

THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER.
THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER.
THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER.

Yes, it sounds very satisfying. Needs to be inserted into every one of those LambdaFail/ slash vs. m/m vs. gay author discussions.

And definitely, I hope you write up something on this for TWC or similar, pointing out two things, actually. First, that regardless of their statistical design, taken as the polls over the years all show that THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER. \o/

Second, that articles based on a few then-available, now-vanished apocrydata need to be updated - to be ground-truthed - at fairly frequent intervals! This is not like citing Shakespeare, people, where the sources can be consulted by all, for hundreds of years. It's cyberdata, fleeting and changeable. Rather appalling to think how many journalists, in particular, have probably based their descriptions of fandom on that Wikipedia entry.

kaz: "Kaz" written in cursive with a white quill that is dissolving into (badly drawn in Photoshop) butterflies. (Default)

[personal profile] kaz 2010-01-17 12:18 pm (UTC)(link)
When I think about the queer-or-something women I meet in fandom, I think a lot of them are people who wouldn't, for whatever reason, feel like they had a place in other LGBT spaces, but still really need a community where queer, of many kinds, is not remarkable

*blinks* Holy shit, were you reading my mind? Because I've had a lot of trouble lately in RL with the split between "I feel as if I'm suffocating in heteronormativity, help!" and "I have no idea whether I'll be welcome in LGBT spaces and don't think I want to risk it."
torachan: (Default)

Re: THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER.

[personal profile] torachan 2010-01-17 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Um. The Lambda thing was very specifically about straight authors, because the whole thing they were getting their panties in a knot about was that the award was for queer authors, and as straight women writing m/m romance, they felt entitled to those awards.
trouble: Sketch of Hermoine from Harry Potter with "Bookworms will rule the world (after we finish the background reading)" on it (Default)

[personal profile] trouble 2010-01-17 04:03 pm (UTC)(link)
You are my favourite. :)
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-01-17 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
So separate out male slash, femslash, and stuff that's incredibly slashy on account of it not being het but doesn't fit neatly into male or female slash? Sounds like a good idea to me.

The deeper I write this thing, the more it looks like it's being designed for me to shove the answers in an easily machine-readable form of file, replace all the usernames with arbitrary numbers that are not their user number, and periodically release it to the wild.

Also to save a copy of the uncompiled poll code for future instances (like, close this one after a year).

Also go suggest that Dreamwidth be persuaded to spit up the uncompiled code of any poll that's been posted so you don't have to bust your ass once you have a good one, just take it and go.
petra: Renee Montoya, cartoon lesbian Latina cop, looking angry (Renee - Someone needs a beating)

[personal profile] petra 2010-01-17 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for putting together the data that shows that my lived experience is real. It's so great when that happens.
stellar_dust: Stylized comic-book drawing of Scully at her laptop in the pilot. (Default)

[personal profile] stellar_dust 2010-01-17 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
... I'm not sure about using the word "fantasize" in every question? I think in most cases you mean "enjoy (and/or get turned on by) reading/writing fiction/fanfic about," but in some questions it seems to mean "have personal sexual fantasies about," and those are not necessarily the same. Right? At least, they're not the same for me, and I wouldn't be sure how to answer this as it's phrased right now.

Although, as I think about it more, I might be changing my mind. IDK. Does anyone else have a thought on this?
naraht: Moonrise over Earth (Default)

[personal profile] naraht 2010-01-17 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Slash is defined as fandom-based romantic and/or erotic narratives...

Do you mean "romantic" as in "like a romance" or "romantic" as in "has sex or sexual attraction or relationships as a significant theme"? Because I think that makes a big difference.
naraht: Moonrise over Earth (Default)

[personal profile] naraht 2010-01-17 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
It might be nice if this had a dedicated post, though, in part because it would be easier for other people to link to. I find this a very interesting discussion but it is a bit buried in here.
azurelunatic: slashgirl (slash character, symbol for woman) (slashgirl)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-01-17 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm, I think you are right, that generating your own fantasies is different than enjoying/going along with something someone else has structured and shared, though generating your own fantasies has a lot in common with the creation process.

So one would possibly say: fantasize about for the sex with oneself
Fantasize about (generating one's own fantasies) a pairing
Enjoy/get turned on by fic about a pairing
(Perhaps even revisit (rehash in one's own memory or re-read) a fic for personal pleasure (no need to get too detailed, either mental pleasure or "I'll be in my bunk"))
Transcribe personal fantasies about a pairing to fic
Generate fic that is then pleasurable to read
Generate fic for the pleasure of others, but that one is personally not pleased/turned on by
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-01-17 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
The latter; I think the Romance Novel narrative is a part of the latter, but hardly the only form.
stellar_dust: Stylized comic-book drawing of Scully at her laptop in the pilot. (Default)

[personal profile] stellar_dust 2010-01-17 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, something like that! There can also be a difference between getting turned on while writing a scene, and the things one imagines in (shall we say) the heat of the moment, I think. But it's a tricky distinction -- & separating fic-fantasy from sex-fantasy might be sufficient for poll purposes? I dunno.
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-01-17 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure how far to inquire! I do like the distinction between fic/fantasy for entertainment purposes, and fic/fantasy for pleasurable purposes, but I'm sort of uncomfortable inquiring too specifically about heat-of-the-moment stuff (without bundling it in with other stuff so it's not just that) in a survey that isn't really intended to be specifically about sex, and moreover, a survey where (if I do this as a DW poll) I could see identifiable answers. That just ... I'm not comfortable with knowing that, and I don't think the general fannish public would be comfortable with me knowing specifically that.
pine: picture of big pine tree in California vineyard (Default)

Re: THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS IDENTIFY AS QUEER.

[personal profile] pine 2010-01-17 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
yes, sorry to muddle it all together. (Being online late at night=muddle w/r/t everything.) I was distressed at how quickly the very specific (and IMO, reasonable and logical) concern of the Lambda folks about m/m written by straight women progressed into the more widespread animadversion against slash, which as we now see, is substantially by women identifying as other-than-straight. Slash /=/ m/m, slashers /=/ "straight housewives." The only thing the two topics have in common is women. Huh. And, I guess, wank, but I may be repeating myself. ;-)

Anyway, I did not mean to give the impression that I thought the entire wank, which like so many has moved across a progression of ever more distantly related issues, was all about Lambda. I think they do fine work, and my concern is not there, but over here in slash fandom - a different realm of reading & writing.
stellar_dust: Stylized comic-book drawing of Scully at her laptop in the pilot. (Default)

[personal profile] stellar_dust 2010-01-17 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I think you're right about that. You might just change "fantasize" to "enjoy fanfic" in all the above questions except the ones about "personally having sex" and "personally connecting"? I probably should have just suggested that in the first place. :/ More details in the poll options starts to get intrusive and probably a little off-topic, as well as magnifying the impossibility of supplying enough choices to specifically suit *everyone*. ie, I'm not sure all the stuff you listed two comments up necessarily has a place in this particular survey; just that what's meant by "fantasize" should be spelled out.
true_statement: Harry Potter (goggles)

[personal profile] true_statement 2010-01-17 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
It occurs to me that in 10+ years of online slash fannishness I've been answering all these surveys in a rather misleading fashion. It's taken all that time to go from "oh well, I guess I'm default straight for lack of a better answer" to "yeah, forget that late-bloomer theory and let's just call an asexual an asexual".

(Anonymous) 2010-01-18 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
How can you count "Unsure" as queer? Unsure is unsure, and should be treated as such.
carmarthen: a baaaaaby plesiosaur (Default)

[personal profile] carmarthen 2010-01-18 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
I think we are self-selecting: we're self-selecting slash fandom. And that's something pretty important.

I think right there explains why I've always identified as a slasher despite writing at least as much het and gen combined as I did (fem)slash. Hmm. I never thought of it that way. But I think it is because slash fandom always felt like a queer space to me.
lavendertook: frodo hugs sam on the boat across the anduin (f/s hugs)

[personal profile] lavendertook 2010-01-18 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
Yay for our side! :-D Thank you so much for doing this!
carmarthen: a baaaaaby plesiosaur (Default)

[personal profile] carmarthen 2010-01-18 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
Also I'd be curious to know how many gen and het fans are queer, if only as a control, but that's just me ^_^

Actually, I think that it would be really interesting to split out m/m, f/f, m/f, poly, and gen fic. Part of the stereotype is not just that slashers are all straight women, but that slashers prefer m/m slash exclusively, or consider it to be "more interesting" than other forms of fiction.

As someone who identifies as a slasher but enjoys fiction of all stripes, this makes me grumpy. And I've love to see some numbers.
carmarthen: a baaaaaby plesiosaur (Default)

[personal profile] carmarthen 2010-01-18 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
For romantic groupings involving more than one person, consider the internal one-to-one relationships between the parties and take an average. A MFM triad with internal F/M and F/M pairings would be composed of opposite-sex pairings; if it also contained an M/M pairing it would be mixed opposite and same sex pairings.

For some questions this would work, but I would consider asking some questions related to polyamory, since that is a huge part of some people's sexual orientation (and there's a related question that may touch on a different question of appropriation--is polyamorous fic mostly being written by polyamorous people? I personally doubt it).

Anyway, there's a HUGE difference for me conceptually as a reader and a poly person between a triad and two F/M couples or whatever.

Page 5 of 11