lilysea: Serious (Default)
Lilysea ([personal profile] lilysea) wrote in [personal profile] melannen 2022-03-11 03:20 am (UTC)

Wow, yeah, I've never heard of anything like that in Australia!

I've never been on a jury in Australia

[and am now chronically ill enough that I would not be able to manage it, even without COVID - I can only concentrate on listening to speech for about 90 minutes before I start missing words and zoning out, no matter how hard I try to pay attention. Plus I need the ability to lie down and be horizontal regularly]

but from what I've heard,

you turn up,

and if you get picked, you get ONE case

which could be "this person was selling a skincare product without the appropriate Therapeutic Goods Administration safety permit" (a real case that really happened in my state, the person accused claimed the skincare product was a food and not a skincare product, and ate a jar of it in court)

or could be murder

but you never get more than ONE case.

Do you have judge-only trials with no jury? We have them here occasionally - I think it's up to the defendant to opt-in, which they do sometimes because either:

a) the defense lawyer thinks the defendant will alienate a jury;

b) due to COVID there are lengthy wait times for a jury trial, and the defendant wants the trial over and done with because they can't get bail because of the risk of them reoffending or intimidating witnesses

The last judge-only trial I heard about in my city was a man who had been accused of murdering three women for his entertainment (also some sexual assaults etc) - he asked for a judge only trial because his defense lawyer did not think a jury would be sympathetic to him[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claremont_serial_killings#Trial

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org