It's possible that they did report n or actual differences on a few things but I didn't realize because they did it in shorthand in parentheticals in a way that would only be recognizable to other psych researchers, and didn't analyze (or label) it at all? But they certainly didn't mention n or actual differences much in the text! (It's also possible there's a data supplement in the for-pay version of the paper but I wasn't dropping $30 to find out.)

The paper is probably shorter than my analysis though.