Belly dancing at the writers' house tonight! And wow, did that make my middle sore fast. Also I need to finally get around to making myself some harem pants, I've only wanted some for *years*.
. . . . And the flist has gone up in controversy again. My views on the matter haven't changed in three months, I'm still annoyed that nobody's looking at this thing logically, but at the moment I'm being puzzled by all the snarking over happiness. Granted, I am not a lawyer, but I did pay attention in Mr. Bright's ninth grade law class, and my understanding was that the "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness" clause *had* previously been cited in constitutional law decisions, as an intent / common law / whatever sort of thing, same way as there's supposedly a "constitutional right to privacy". 'Cause, you know, we may *have* an explicit written document, but that doesn't mean we don't have a British style constitution too. And the Declaration and the Federalist Papers are a part of it.
Am I just totally makin' that up? 'Cause some of the people complaining about legal "right to happiness" arguments *are* lawyers, and I'd like to think they know what they're talking about, but it's not how *I* understand the law . . .
Random tangential anecdote: My image of traditional American weddings is intricately tied up with my understanding of the New Testament, because the first wedding I can clearly remember, I was a bridesmaid, and the couple were hours late to the reception, and therefore I had to stand outside the reception hall waiting to greet them, at night, in the dark, in my uncomfortable dress and shoes, tired and hungry and bored, staring in at the lighted room where all the other guests were already enjoying themselves . . . luckily, the lights were electric, and I did eventually get to go in. Someday I should discuss my feelings about the phrase "walk in the way of the Lord," too. . .